rotor, thereby causing the sensed capacitance to be zero when the brakes are applied. We thus also
sustain the rejection of claim 10 as being unpatentable over Paielli in view of Hanisko.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner 1-to reject claims 13 is AFFIRMED.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007