Ex Parte SILVER et al - Page 1


           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                  for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        

                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                         
                                   ____________                                     
                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                            
                                AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                   ____________                                     
                   Ex parte BRIAN H. SILVER AND GOTTHILF WENIGER                    
                                   ____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 2006-1300                                
                             Application No. 08/203,672                             
                                   ____________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                      
                                   ____________                                     
            Before McQUADE, HANLON, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent              
            Judges.                                                                 
            McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
                 Brian H. Silver et al. appeal from the final rejection             
            of claims 20-26.1  Claims 8-14 and 19, the only other claims            
            pending in the application, stand allowed.                              
                                   THE INVENTION                                    
                 The subject matter on appeal relates to a disposable               
            plastic bag for storing breast milk.  Representative claims             
            20, 24 and 25 read as follows:                                          
                                                                                    
            1 Claims 20-26 correspond to claims 1-4, 18, 25, and 26, respectively,  
            in U.S. Patent No. 6,328,082 to Lafond.  The appellants copied these    
            claims in an attempt to provoke an interference with the patent (see    
            the paper filed June 11, 2002).                                         
                                         1                                          


Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007