The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication in a law journal
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte DAVID C. MAY
________________
Appeal No. 2006-1309
Application No. 09/166,625
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, WARREN, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
REQUEST FOR REHEARING
Appellant requests rehearing of our Decision of
April 28, 2006 wherein we affirmed the examiner's rejections of
all the appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
We have thoroughly reviewed the points made in appellant's
Request, but we remain of the opinion that the claimed subject
matter would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007