Ex Parte Jacobson - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                             Ex parte Michael B. Jacobson                                               
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                                 Appeal No. 2006-1332                                                   
                                               Application No. 09/548,687                                               
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                         
                                                     ____________                                                       
              Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                          
              BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                       


                     A patent examiner rejected claims 1-6 and 9-22.  The appellant appeals                             
              therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a).  We affirm.                                                           


                                                  I. BACKGROUND                                                         
                     The invention at issue on appeal concerns distributed data processing.  In some                    
              computer systems, storage controllers are connected between a host and storage                            
              devices.  Each storage controller is associated with, and responsible for the control of, a               
              particular group of storage devices.  Although each storage controller is familiar with the               
              status of its associated storage devices, it is unaware of the existence or status of the                 
              storage devices associated with the other storage controllers.  Consequently, the host                    







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007