Ex Parte Roser - Page 3


                 Appeal No.  2006-1335                                                        Page 3                  
                 Application No.  09/888,734                                                                          
                        The examiner relies on Livesey to make up for the deficiency in Curtis.                       
                 According to the examiner, Livesey “provides motivation for lyophilizing ‘native’                    
                 Factor VIII in trehalose without albumin by not only claiming a specific                             
                 embodiment (claim 17) of lyophilizing Factor VIII[ ]2, but also disclosing [(column                  
                 9, lines 16-24)] that trehalose, and not albumin, is one of a number of agents                       
                 particularly suited to dry preservation of macromolecules such as proteins.” 3                       
                 Answer, page 4.                                                                                      
                        Based on this evidence, the examiner concludes (Answer, page 5),                              
                        the artisan of ordinary skill seeking to preserve the “native” Factor                         
                        VIII encompassed by Livesey’s claim 17, recognizing that Factor                               
                        VIII is a protein, clearly would have looked to trehalose instead of                          
                        albumin, based on Livesey’s disclosure that trehalose is one of a                             
                        number of agents particularly suited for protein protection in freeze-                        
                        drying procedures, and albumin is not. Additional motivation for                              
                        freeze-drying Factor VIII using trehalose in the absence of albumin                           
                        would have been derived from the fact that the lone example of                                
                        protein freeze-drying of Livesey, Example 5 at columns 23 and 24,                             
                        demonstrates that the integrity of a protein containing viral vaccine                         
                        is adequately protected by trehalose in buffer with no other                                  
                        preservative agents.                                                                          
                        Appellant does not dispute that Curtis teaches “a method for preparing a                      
                 purified and stable activated Factor VIII.”  Brief, page 6.  Appellant argues,                       
                 however, “any teaching regarding how activated Factor VIII might be stabilized                       




                                                                                                                      
                 2 For clarity, we note that Livesey’s specification and claim 17, refer to Factor VIII without       
                 reference to whether this blood factor is in its native or activated form.  As we understand the     
                 examiner’s argument, the examiner has interpreted this reference to Factor VIII as a generic         
                 reference to both the native and activated forms of Factor VIII.                                     
                                                                                                                     
                 3 For the reasons that follow, we disagree with the examiner’s interpretation of this disclosure of  
                 Livesey.                                                                                             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007