Appeal No. 2006-1346 Παγε 7 Application No. 09/845,542 We agree with the examiner that paragraph 0067 of Sherr discloses detecting a screen location from screen coordinates of a computer mouse in that Sherr discloses [0067] that a cursor is placed on a image and a mouse is clicked to activate the image. We will therefore, sustain the examiner's rejection of claim 10. In regard to claims 11 to 14, appellants repeat the arguments made for claims 1 and 7 to 9. We will therefore, sustain the examiner's rejection of these claims for the reasons given above in regard to the examiner's rejection of claim 1 and 7 to 9. In regard to claim 15, which recites that the shopping summary is retired upon detection of a right click if the shopping summary is shown and turned on upon detection of a right click if the shopping summary is not shown, the examiner takes Official Notice that turning programs on and off utilizing a single on/off switch activation mechanism such as a mouse click is old and well known in the art and such would have been obvious to show information that was currently needed and not show information that was not currently needed. The appellants argue that there is no motivation to modify the Sherr system so as to include the subject matter of claim 15. We do not agree. Sherr discloses that information can be displayed upon the detection of a right click as we discussed above. Sherr also discloses that the information displayed may be additional information for example, about the content to be purchased [0011], or links to websites to purchase a physical copy of the contentPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007