Appeal No. 2006-1347 Page 15
Application No. 10/651,205
are not obvious because Harris also does not cure the deficiency of Rinderer. We
have found that Rinderer inherently discloses providing a compression fit, and we
thus sustain the rejection of claims 6 and 18-21 for the same reasons provided
above for claim 1.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1-16, 18-21, 29,
and 30 is affirmed.
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007