Appeal No. 2006-1355 Παγε 4 Application No. 10/266,657 sustain this rejection as it is directed to claim 1 or claims 2 to 4 and 7 dependent thereon. We likewise will not sustain the rejection of claims 5 to 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Simmons in view of Krauss. Claims 5 to 7 depend from claim 1 and thus require that the support surface supports the packaging material during cutting. The examiner relies on Simmons for teaching a support surface that supports the packaging material during cutting. We have determined that Simmons does not disclose a support surface that supports the packaging material during cutting. The decision of the examiner is reversed.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007