Appeal No. 2006-1356
Application No. 10/375,826
compounds, Capone would have motivated one of ordinary skill in
the art to select the disclosed polyethylene for the polymeric
material of WO ‘648.
As a final point, we notice that appellant bases no argument
upon objective evidence of nonobviousness, such as unexpected
results, which would serve to rebut the inference of obviousness
established by the applied prior art.
In conclusion, based on the foregoing and the reasons well-
stated by the examiner, the examiner’s decision rejecting the
appealed claims is affirmed.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007