Appeal No. 2006-1365 Application No. 10/672,133 conventional text pager” (¶ 0066). “[D]uring the airing of a vitamin advertisement, users would push select button 1220 to purchase the vitamin product…. After select button 1220 is pushed, the system administrator would immediately receive the user’s order through a wireless network” (¶ 0090). The appellant argues that “the broadcast receiver of Kesling, et al., discloses at most an ‘informational request,’ and not a ‘purchase request’ as claimed the [sic] present invention” (brief, page 5), and that “the most reasonable interpretation of the term ‘transaction’ in this passage of Kesling, et al. [i.e., ‘[t]he listener might even complete the transaction using radio 20, which, since it includes the high power wireless transceiver, can function as a conventional text pager’ (¶ 0066)], appears to be that the transaction of the listener obtaining further information can be completed through the text messaging of the wireless transceiver” (brief, page 6). Kesling’s disclosure that “during the airing of a vitamin advertisement, users would push select button 1220 to purchase the vitamin product” (¶ 0090) indicates that the transaction referred to by Kesling is a purchase. The appellant argues that the only technical detail disclosed by Kesling is that the broadcast receiver includes a high power wireless transceiver and can function as a conventional text pager (¶ 0066), and that this disclosure would 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007