The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte GHITA LANZENDORFER, ANGELIKA BORMANN,
JENS NIELSEN, BIRGIT HARGENS,
HEIDI RIEDEL, and STEPHANIE VON THADEN
__________
Appeal No. 2006-1383
Application No. 10/025,065
__________
ON BRIEF1
__________
Before ADAMS, GRIMES, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges.
ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, and 3-8, which are all the claims pending in
the application.
Claims 1 and 4 are illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and are
reproduced below:
1. A cosmetic or dermatological emulsion of the oil-in-water type,
comprising
(i) up to 90% by weight of a water phase,
(ii) 0.5% to 20% by weight of a lipid phase, based on the total
weight of the preparation,
1 Appellants waived their request for oral hearing. Paper received June 23, 2006. Accordingly,
we considered this appeal on Brief.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007