The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte MICHAEL SHALIT _____________ Appeal No. 2006-1386 Application No. 10/206,567 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before OWENS, CRAWFORD, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal is from a rejection of claims 1-10 and 15-19. Claims 11-14 have been canceled and claims 20-24 stand withdrawn from consideration by the examiner as claiming a nonelected invention. THE INVENTION The appellant claims a trash bag removal system. Claim 1 is illustrative: 1. A trash bag removal system comprising: at least one flexible trash can liner having first and second ends, said at least one trash can liner adapted to be arranged within a trash can having a top rim and at least one internal sidewall, said at least one trash can liner being positioned within the trash can adjacent the at least one sidewall so as to form opposing first and second sides terminating at said first and second ends where both of said ends extend toward the top rim of the trash can and are notPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007