Ex Parte Shalit - Page 1




              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is           
                                           not binding precedent of the Board.                                            



                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                     _____________                                                        
                                     BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                     _____________                                                        
                                              Ex parte MICHAEL SHALIT                                                     
              _____________                                                                                               
                                                  Appeal No. 2006-1386                                                    
                                               Application No. 10/206,567                                                 
                                                    ______________                                                        
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                           
                                                    _______________                                                       

              Before OWENS, CRAWFORD, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges                                              
              OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                         
                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                     This appeal is from a rejection of claims 1-10 and 15-19.  Claims 11-14 have been                    
              canceled and claims 20-24 stand withdrawn from consideration by the examiner as claiming a                  
              nonelected invention.                                                                                       
                                                    THE INVENTION                                                         
                     The appellant claims a trash bag removal system.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                           
                     1. A trash bag removal system comprising:                                                            
                            at least one flexible trash can liner having first and second ends, said at least one         
              trash can liner adapted to be arranged within a trash can having a top rim and at least one internal        
              sidewall, said at least one trash can liner being positioned within the trash can adjacent the at           
              least one sidewall so as to form opposing first and second sides terminating at said first and              
              second ends where both of said ends extend toward the top rim of the trash can and are not                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007