The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RAYMOND JEFFREY MAY, JAMES MARCUS CARR,
MICHEAL SCOTT BRUNNER, LAVADA CAMPBELL BOGGS,
HANNONG RHIM, JAMES RUSSELL FITTS, JR.,
KENNETH MICHAEL SALTER, VICTOR CHARLES LANG,
ADRIAN ROY EGGEN and OOMMAN PAINUMOOTTIL THOMAS
____________
Appeal No. 2006-1394
Application No. 09/855,188
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WARREN, WALTZ and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s final rejection of claims
1 through 17, 19 through 21, and 50 through 59, which are the only claims pending in this
application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007