Appeal No. 2006-1395 Παγε 8
Application No. 10/687,875
The examiner's rejections of claims 19 and 20 under the judicially created doctrine
of obviousness-type double patenting are sustained. The examiner's rejections of claims
19 and 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are not sustained.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may
be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
CHARLES, E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
MURRIEL, E. CRAWFORD ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
JENNIFER, D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
MEC/lg
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007