Appeal No. 2006-1402 Application No. 10/788,543 In summary: we have sustained the rejection of claims 21, 24, 26 through 28 and 31 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). Therefore, the decision of the examiner is affirmed. However, since our rationale used to sustain the rejection is considerably different than that of the examiner, we feel that the thrust of the rejection has been altered to such an extent that we are compelled to denominate the affirmance of the rejection as being a NEW GROUND OF REJECTION under 37 CFR § 41.50(b). This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to 37 CFR § 41.50(b) (effective September 13, 2004, 69 Fed. Reg. 49960 (August 12, 2004). 37 CFR § 41.50(b) provides "[a] new ground of rejection pursuant to this paragraph shall not be considered final for judicial review." 37 CFR § 41.50(b) also provides that the appellant, WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of the following two options with respect to the new ground of rejection to avoid termination of the appeal as to the rejected claims: (1) Reopen prosecution. Submit an appropriate amendment of the claims so rejected or new evidence relating to the claims so rejected, or both, and have the matter reconsidered by the examiner, in which event the proceeding will be remanded to the examiner. . . . 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007