Ex Parte Deckers - Page 8



           Appeal No. 2006-1402                                                                      
           Application No. 10/788,543                                                                

           In summary: we have sustained the rejection of claims 21, 24, 26 through 28               
           and 31 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). Therefore, the decision of the examiner is               
           affirmed.                                                                                 

           However, since our rationale used to sustain the rejection is considerably                
           different than that of the examiner, we feel that the thrust of the rejection has         
           been altered to such an extent that we are compelled to denominate the affirmance         
           of the rejection as being a NEW GROUND OF REJECTION under 37 CFR                          
           § 41.50(b).                                                                               

                 This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to 37 CFR                 
           § 41.50(b) (effective September 13, 2004, 69 Fed. Reg. 49960 (August 12, 2004).           
           37 CFR § 41.50(b) provides "[a] new ground of rejection pursuant to this                  
           paragraph shall not be considered final for judicial review."                             
                 37 CFR § 41.50(b) also provides that the appellant, WITHIN TWO                      
           MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of the                            
           following two options with respect to the new ground of rejection to avoid                
           termination of the appeal as to the rejected claims:                                      
                       (1) Reopen prosecution.  Submit an appropriate amendment of                   
                 the claims so rejected or new evidence relating to the claims so                    
                 rejected, or both, and have the matter reconsidered by the examiner,                
                 in which event the proceeding will be remanded to the examiner. . . .               


                                                 8                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007