Ex Parte Darby - Page 2




             Appeal No. 2006-1408                                                           Page 2               
             Application No. 10/019,669                                                                          


                                                BACKGROUND                                                       
                   The appellant's invention relates to a healing shoe or sandal designed to aid in              
             reducing pressure or weight from specific areas of the feet.  The invention utilizes                
             alterable insole layers of varying densities and degrees of firmness that fit into an area          
             surrounded by a circumferential counter of the out sole in order to hold the insole layers          
             in position.  A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the                 
             appellant's brief.                                                                                  
                                               Applied Prior Art                                                 
             Grim et al. (Grim)    5,329,705   Jul. 19, 1994                                                     
             Darby et al. (Darby ‘133)   5,370,133   Dec. 6, 1994                                                
             Darby (Darby ‘909)    5,491,909   Feb. 20, 1996                                                     
             Kellerman     5,799,414   Sep. 1, 1998                                                              

                                                The Rejections                                                   
                   Claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 31, 41 and 42 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §               
             103 as being unpatentable over Darby ‘909 in view of Darby ‘133 and Grim and claim                  
             32 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Darby ‘909 in                   
             view of Darby ‘133, Grim and Kellerman.                                                             
                   Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and                 
             the appellant regarding this appeal, we make reference to the examiner's answer                     
             (mailed August 26, 2005) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the                    









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007