Appeal No. 2006-1413 Page 9 Application No. 09/952,073 services." (Col. 1, ll. 14-18.) "The use of the secure token device enables ISPs to tailor their service offerings and billing options to individual users. The users may be offered different service options." (Col. 4, ll. 42-44.) Because Jaalinoja teaches ordering an electronic token that allows a wireless terminals access to an external network or access to local services, or DiGiorgio teaches ordering ISP-provided services for a user's "PDA, a personal computer (PC) or a workstation," (col. 5, ll. 47-48), we find that teachings from the prior art itself would have suggested ordering a service for an electronic device. B. BASING PROVISIONING ON ANSWERS The examiner finds that Jaalinoja teaches the following features: • prompting said user to answer a plurality of questions [paragraph 0021i.e. WAP service is inherent]; • generating corresponding provisioning information for said network communication device within said electronic device based on answers given by said user in response to said plurality of questions [paragraphs 0021-24 i.e. generating a token according to the received token request or to the WAP service][.] (Examiner's Answer at 4-5.) The appellants argue, "Paragraphs 0021-0024 of Jaalinoja may provide the generation of a token according to a token request but certainly not based on answers given by a user in response to a series of questions during the order placement of the electronic device." (App. Br. at 5.)Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007