The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte KEVIN P. BAKER,
MAUREEN BERESINI, LAURA DEFORGE,
LUC DESNOYERS, ELLEN FILVAROFF,
WEI-QIANG GAO, MARY E. GERRITSEN,
AUDREY GODDARD, PAUL J. GODOWSKI,
AUSTIN L. GURNEY, STEVEN SHERWOOD,
VICTORIA SMITH, TIMOTHY A. STEWART,
DANIEL TUMAS, COLIN K. WATANABE,
WILLIAM I. WOOD, and ZEMIN ZHANG
__________
Appeal No. 2006-1426
Application No. 10/145,821
__________
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
__________
Before FLEMING, Chief Administrative Patent Judge,
HARKCOM, Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and
SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge.
Per curiam
On June 30, 2006, counsel for the appellants filed a Request for Continued
Examination (RCE) under 37 CFR § 1.114. Pursuant to the notice entitled “Request for
Continued Examination Practice and Changes to Provisional Application Practice,”
65 Fed. Reg. 50092, 50095 (Aug. 16, 2000), and the provisions of 37 CFR § 1.114(d),
a request for continued examination under 37 CFR § 1.114 filed after appeal has been
Page: 1 2 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007