The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and isnot binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte RANCE W. SEARLE and MARTY G. HANSON ____________ Appeal No. 2006-1428 Application No. 10/669,157 Technology Center [3600] ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before BAHR, LEVY, and FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges. LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7-10 and 13-24, which are all of the claims pending in this application. We REVERSE. BACKGROUND The appellants' invention relates to container gardening and a planter (specification, page 1). Claim 1 is representative of the invention, and is reproduced as follows:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007