Ex Parte Struye et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2006-1434                                                                                       
              Application No. 10/356,621                                                                                 

                                                    BACKGROUND                                                           
                     The invention relates to method and apparatus for authenticating an item (e.g., a                   
              banknote or a passport) by checking for particular stimulable (storage) phosphors                          
              contained in the item.  Claim 1 is reproduced below.                                                       
              1. A method for proving authenticity of an item differing from a storage phosphor                          
              screen, wherein said item is provided onto or into at least part thereof, with storage                     
              phosphor particles embedded in a flexible binder, said method comprising the steps of:                     
                     - checking for presence of said storage (stimulable) phosphor by first irradiating                  
              the item with electromagnetic radiation having a wavelength shorter than the                               
              wavelength emitted by the stimulable phosphor,                                                             
                     - stimulating the phosphor with electromagnetic radiation having a wavelength                       
              longer than the wavelength emitted by the phosphor,                                                        
                     - detecting the stimulated emission of the phosphor and transforming the light                      
              signal into a visual and/or an audio signal, wherein said stimulable phosphor is                           
              composed of MII FX:Eu2+, MII representing Ba or Sr and X representing Br or I.                             
                     The examiner relies on the following references:                                                    
              Papadopoulos et al. (Papadopoulos)  5,670,086  Sep. 23, 1997                                               
              Huston et al. (Huston)        US 6,211,526 B1 Apr.    3, 2001                                              
              Kimura et al. (Kimura)            US 2002/0097899 A1 Jul.   25, 2002                                       
                                                                              (filed Nov.   3, 1998)                     
                     Claims 1-6, 19, and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                
              unpatentable over Huston and Papadopoulos.                                                                 
                     Claims 7-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                         
              Huston, Papadopoulos, and Kimura.                                                                          


                                                           -2-                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007