The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SNORRI T. INGVARSSON, ROGER H. KOCH, and STUART S.P. PARKIN ____________ Appeal No. 2006-1439 Application No. 10/195,178 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before PAK, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judges. JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 3, and 6.1 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134. 1 According to appellants, Brief, page 2, claim 2 is objected to as dependent upon a rejected base claim. Claims 4 and 5 stand objected to under 37 CFR §1.75(c). As such these claims are not on review by the Board.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007