The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
was not written for publication in
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
___________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
___________
Ex parte CHARLES KORMANIK JR.
___________
Appeal No. 2006-1451
Application No. 08/802,472
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before FRANKFORT, BAHR and FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.
FETTING, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §134 from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 5, 81 to 15, 17, 18, 20, 22, 23, 28 to 31, 49, 51, 53, 55 and 57.
Claims 19, 21, 27, 50, 52, 54, 56 and 58 are objected to and claims 24 to 26 are
allowed. These are all of the claims pending in the application.
We affirm-in-part and make new rejections under 37 CFR § 41.50 (b).
1 Although the examiner’s final rejection, mailed Dec. 2, 2003, indicated that claims 5, 9 to 15, 17, 18, 20, 22, 23, 28
to 31, 49, 51, 53, 55 and 57 were those rejected on the cover form, claim 8 was also rejected on p. 3 of the final
rejection.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007