Ex Parte KORMANIK - Page 26


              Appeal No. 2006-1451                                                                                      
              Application No. 08/802,472                                                                                

              11/1/1993).  For example, the Babe Ruth wristwatch was clearly marketed together with                     
              its plastic baseball shaped package that held a Babe Ruth logo on it, as shown by the                     
              presence of both the watch and package on the original advertisement.  The watch                          
              contains an emblem of the playing field of the sport the iconic baseball conveys,                         
              implying use during a baseball event and the case is a plastic baseball replica, and                      
              therefore a toy after removal of the watch, made of plastic, and as such could be written                 
              upon with a magic marker.  Spector’s bear shaped container contains a jar, not in any                     
              manner shaped as a bear and gummy bears, described as similar, but clearly not the                        
              same, and therefore different from, the shape of the bear container.  A large bear in a                   
              shape similar, but not the same as, a gummy bear might suggest eating gummy bears.                        
              Servick’s football shaped container is taught to also be a toy and can contain such items                 
              as deodorant used during sports activities in shoes, and can have a keychain                              
              attachment and can be made of a number of materials that inherently accept writing                        
              upon them.                                                                                                

                                                      CONCLUSION                                                        

                  To summarize,                                                                                         

                  • The rejection of claims the rejections of claims 5, 9, 11, 13, 20, 22, 28, 30 and                   
                     31 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being unpatentable as anticipated over Gossard                      
                     are sustained.                                                                                     

                  • The rejections of claims 8, 12, 18, 29, 51, 53, 55 and 57 under 35 U.S.C. § 103                     
                     as being unpatentable as obvious over Gossard are sustained.                                       



                                                           26                                                           



Page:  Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007