Ex Parte Takachi - Page 5




             transmission control member (18) for a selected rotation distance without moving                          
             intermediate element (17) towards the disengagement position.                                             
                     This is evident from Figures 6A-6D and 7A-7D of Yam         ane.  As shown, once the              
             gears  move from an idle state (shown in Figures 6A and 7A) to a state in which operatin        g         
             member (16) is being rotated, the surface (171a in Figure 6B, 171b in Figure 7B) of                       
             second gear portion (171) engages the surface (160a in Figure 6B, 160b in Figure 7B) o          f         
             gear portion (160) and second gear portion (171) immediately starts to move to the left                   
             toward the disengagement position (shown in Figures 6B and 7B).                                           
                     The device of Yamane is also structured so that “intermediate element 17 is in                    
             constant engagement with the takeup member 18.”  (Yamane, col. 6, lines 18-20).                           
             Further, the tooth measurement (171h) of the second gear portion (171) is sized so that                   
             “the gear teeth of the second gear portion 171 of the intermediate element       do not move              
             over t he teeth of the gear portion 160 of the operating element 16 and remain capture        d by        
             the same mating teeth. …”  (Yamane, col. 6, lines 33-36) (emphasis added).  As such,                      
             when the user rotates operating membe      r (16), the gear portion (160) of operating member             
             (16) engages second gear portion (171) of intermediate element (17) causing immediate                     
             rotation thereof, which in turn causes   immediate rotati   on of takeup member (18) by virtue            
             of its constant engagement with intermediate element (17).                                                
                     We  find that Yamane fails to disclose a bicycle shift control device “wherein the                
             first coupling member and the second coupling member are structured so that rotation of                   
             the operating member rotates the transmission control member for a selected rotational                    
             distance without moving the second position setting member toward the disengagement                       
             position,” as recited in claim 1.  We also find that Yamane fails to disclose any structure               
             that would perform the recited function of “allowing the operating member to rotate the                   
             transmission control member for a selected rotational distance without the second                         






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007