The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte SHARIDAN LORRAINE STILES ______________ Appeal No. 2006-1474 Application 10/219,095 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before FRANKFORT, CRAWFORD and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge. REMAND TO THE EXAMINER The above identified application is being remanded to the examiner under 37 CFR § 41.50(a)(1) for appropriate action with regard to the items indicated below. 1. The original specification describes appellant’s invention as being directed to “a hand- held razor having blades of a smaller dimension to facilitate personal grooming” (page 1, lines 4-5)(emphasis added). It is further noted that the razor is for removing unwanted body hair in hard-to-reach or awkward places and may be used to groom eyebrows, moustache, nose, sideburns, toes, or bikini areas. It is specifically indicated that “[t]he invention is able to do these things because the size of the razor blades are very small in comparison to 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007