The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID W. FULLER, SUNDEEP CHANDHOKE, CHRISTOPHER CIFRA, and
NICOLAS VAZQUEZ
____________
Appeal No. 2006-1475
Application No. 10/021,728
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
rejection of claims 1-4, 7-21, 24-32 and 34-55, which constitute all the claims pending in
this application.
The disclosed invention pertains generally to a graphical programming
development environment operable to aid a user in creating a graphical program by
determining and indicating suggested nodes and/or user interface elements to include in
the graphical program.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007