Appeal 2006-1483 Application 10/159,395 FIG. 4 is a photographic plan view enlarged about 20 times actual size of the fabric side of a prior art, non–layered, creped paper sheet 60 processed generally in accordance with the teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 3,301,746, said sheet being formed from a single, homogeneously mixed slurry containing approximately 50 percent softwood and 50 percent hardwood fibers. The sheet as subjected to fluid pressure and thermally pre-dried on a 26 x22 semi-twill drying/imprinting fabric prepared as described in the aforementioned patent of Peter G. Ayers, compacted by the fabric knuckles upon transfer to a Yankee dryer drum, finally dried, and creped upon removal from the drum by means of a doctor blade. The finished sheet contains approximately 16 percent crepe. As shown in FIG. 5, the sheet has the appearance of a lazy corrugation with only a minor portion of the fibers on the fabric side 60a of the sheet extending outwardly away from the surface of the sheet when viewed in the cross-machine direction. FIG. 6 is a plan view enlarged about the same extent as FIG. 4 of the fabric side 70a of a layered, creped paper sheet 70 of the present invention produced generally in accordance with the process illustrated in FIG. 1, said sheet being formed from two identical slurries of essentially the same fiber content, each slurry containing approximately 50 percent softwood and 50 percent hardwood fibers in a homogeneous mixture. The basis weights, processing conditions, drying/imprinting fabric, and degree of crepe were essentially the same as those of non-layered prior art sheet shown in FIGS. 4 and 5. As should be apparent from a comparison of FIGS. 5 and 7, the fabric side 70a of the layered sheet has a greater proportion of its fibers deflected outwardly in a direction generally away from the plane of the sheet. [(Morgan, col. 11, ll. 32- 66) (Emphasis ours).] Thus, from our perspective, the claimed tissue papers and the tissue papers produced by Morgan not only appear to be identical or substantially identical, but also appear to be produced by substantially the same method. Compare the above teachings in Morgan with Specification at 6, 12-14, and 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007