The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte WILLIAM EARL RUSSELL II,
DAVID JOSEPH KROPACZEK and GLEN ALAN WATFORD
_____________
Appeal No. 2006-1486
Application No. 10/608,086
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before OWENS, LEVY, and NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from a rejection of claims 31-41, which are
all of the pending claims.
THE INVENTION
The appellants claim an optimization process for a nuclear
reactor. Claim 31 is illustrative:
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007