The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte MASAYOSHI KOBAYASHI __________ Appeal No. 2006-1497 Application No. 09/770,017 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before HAIRSTON, BLANKENSHIP, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges. HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 7, 10, 14, 22, 24 through 27 and 29. Claims 8, 11, 15 and 23 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent claim form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The disclosed invention relates to a method and apparatus for determining whether predetermined conditions have been met for replacing a sub-tree structure of a tree structure with an equivalent table.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007