Appeal No. 2006-1500 Application No. 10/701,325 of the argued groups, i.e., claims 1, 2 and 8. See 37 CFR § 41.37(c)(1)(vii)(2004). Claim 1 Tubel discloses downhole control systems that can communicate with downhole control systems in other zones in the same or different wells (col. 5, lines 16-19). The control systems have multiple downhole electronically controlled electromechanical devices and multiple computer based surface systems operated from multiple locations (col. 6, lines 9-13). Information obtained by transmitters and receivers is forwarded to a downhole module and transmitted to the surface by hardwired or wireless communication techniques, such as transmission using an inductive coupler and a tubular encased conductor (col. 18, lines 42-49). More discloses that inductively coupling a first downhole coil and an adjacent second downhole coil “desirably eliminates the need to mechanically connect the elements on which the coils are mounted, and thus greatly simplifies the handling of downhole equipment in preparation for (and during) drilling, logging, and producing operations” (col. 1, lines 23-28). 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007