Appeal No. 2006-1534 Application No. 09/829,007 CONCLUSION To summarize, • The rejections of claims 1, 4-8, 10, 12-15, 16-18, and 20-28 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being unpatentable as anticipated by Finkelstein, are sustained. • The rejections of claims 9 and 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable as obvious over Finkelstein, are sustained. • The rejections of claims 2 and 3 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable as obvious over Finkelstein in view of Brown ‘163, are sustained. • The rejections of claims 11 and 35-40 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable as obvious over Finkelstein in view of Brown ‘469, are sustained. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). 14Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007