Ex Parte Noggle - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
              for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                              
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                      
                                     ____________                                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                     ____________                                                     
                              Ex parte KENNETH G. NOGGLE                                              
                                     ____________                                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2006-1538                                                 
                              Application No. 09/782,915                                              
                                     ____________                                                     
                                 HEARD: June 6, 2006                                                  
                                     ____________                                                     
          Before FRANKFORT, CRAWFORD, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                         
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                     

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                      
          rejection of claims 1 through 7. Claims 20 through 32, the only                             
          other claims remaining in the application, stand allowed. Claims                            
          8 through 19 have been cancelled.                                                           

          Appellant’s invention relates to a device for adjusting the                                 
          position of a cutting edge of an insert secured to the body of a                            
          multiple insert tool, such as a rotary cutter, or a rotary                                  















Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007