Ex Parte Giacchetti et al - Page 1





                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding
                                                    precedent of the Board                                              

                                UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                    _______________                                                     
                                     BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                    _______________                                                     
                              Ex parte DANIELA GIACCHETTI and GILLES RUBINSTENN                                         
                                                                                                                       
                                                    ______________                                                      
                                                 Appeal No. 2006-1544                                                   
                                                Application 10/024,621                                                  
                                                    _______________                                                     
                                                        ON BRIEF                                                        
                                                    _______________                                                     
              Before FRANKFORT, BAHR and FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.                                         
              FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   

                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
              This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 69, all              
              of the claims pending in the application.                                                                 
              Appellants’ invention relates to a system and method for providing guidance for a subject                 
              (user). More particularly, as noted on page 1 of the specification, the invention uses profile            
              information about a subject together with a birth-related classification, such as an                      
              astrological horoscope sign of the subject, as a basis for providing beauty advice to the                 
              subject. Independent claims 1, 36, 53, 55, 56, 59 and 67 are representative of the subject                



                                                             1                                                          



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007