The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte DANIELA GIACCHETTI and GILLES RUBINSTENN ______________ Appeal No. 2006-1544 Application 10/024,621 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before FRANKFORT, BAHR and FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges. FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 69, all of the claims pending in the application. Appellants’ invention relates to a system and method for providing guidance for a subject (user). More particularly, as noted on page 1 of the specification, the invention uses profile information about a subject together with a birth-related classification, such as an astrological horoscope sign of the subject, as a basis for providing beauty advice to the subject. Independent claims 1, 36, 53, 55, 56, 59 and 67 are representative of the subject 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007