Ex Parte Stabel et al - Page 1




                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and            
                                                 is not binding precedent of the Board                                             

                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        

                                                       _______________                                                             
                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                       _______________                                                             
                                      Ex parte:  JURGEN STABEL and MINGMIN REN                                                     
                                                       _______________                                                             
                                                     Appeal No. 2006-1556                                                          
                                                   Application No. 10/460,812                                                      
                                                         ____________                                                              
                                      ORDER REMANDING APPEAL TO EXAMINER                                                           
                                                         ____________                                                              
                          This application was electronically received at the Board of Patent Appeals and                          
               Interferences on March 30, 2006 .  A review of the application has revealed that the application is                 
               not ready for review and consideration.  Accordingly, the application is herewith being returned                    
               to the examiner.  The matters requiring attention prior to docketing are identified below.                          
                                                   EXAMINER’S ANSWER                                                               
                       On July 15, 2005, an Examiner’s Answer was mailed in response to the Appeal Brief                           
               received April 1, 2005.  The rejections listed in the Examiner’s Answer included:                                   
                          1) claims 1-2 under 35 U.S.C. §102(b) over the admitted prior art, and                                   





                                                               -1-                                                                 




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007