Appeal No. 2006-1565 Page 6 Application No. 09/757,610 In our view, the reasons and evidence cited in support of the examiner’s rejection do not provide a reasonable basis to question the adequacy of the disclosure provided for the claimed invention. Accordingly, the rejection of claims 8-14 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, for lack of enablement is reversed. REVERSED Toni R. Scheiner ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Demetra J. Mills ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) Lora M. Green ) Administrative Patent Judge )Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007