Appeal No. 2006-1573 Page 4 Application No. 09/818,175 n.2, 150 USPQ 441, 444, n.2 (CCPA 1966). The entertainment system teachings of Beach are merely cumulative to the teachings of Ortega. The obviousness rejection of claims 2 through 10, 12 through 20 and 22 through 30 is likewise sustained because appellants have not presented any patentability arguments for these claims. DECISION The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 30 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv). AFFIRMED ) James D. Thomas ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Kenneth W. Hairston ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) Jerry Smith ) Administrative Patent Judge ) KWH/eldPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007