Appeal Number: 2006-1574
Application Number: 09/903,177
• The rejection of claim 3 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Minnesota in
view of Transportation Issues is sustained.
• The rejection of claims 4 through 7 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over
Minnesota in view of Task Force is sustained.
• The rejection of claims 8 through 10 and 19 through 21 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
obvious over Minnesota is sustained.
• The rejection of claims 11, 12, 14 and 18 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over
Minnesota in view of Marion is sustained.
• The rejection of claim 2 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Minnesota in
view of Plotkin is sustained.
• The rejection of claims 24-27 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Walkey in
view of Pollock is sustained.
• The rejection of claim 17 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Minnesota in
view of Walkey is sustained.
• The rejection of claim 15 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Minnesota in
view of Walkey and further in view of Pollock is sustained.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be
extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007