The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte KAREL ABRAHAM KUIJPERS, SERGEY MICHAILOVICH MEL’NIKOV, and ARJEN SEIN ____________ Appeal 2006-1584 Application 10/139,118 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: September 29, 2006 ____________ Before KIMLIN, WALTZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL and ORDER REMANDING THE APPLICATION TO THE EXAMINER Appellants appeal the rejection of claims 1-17, the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007