Appeal No. 2006-1592
Application No. 09/757,431
reversed because we agree with the appellants’ argument (brief,
page 7) that the applied references neither teach nor would have
suggested to the skilled artisan a specific condition sent by the
data manager and received by the index manager “in response to
the callback.”
DECISION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 14,
56 and 57 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is reversed.
REVERSED
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007