Ex Parte Badesha et al - Page 1



                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                     
                               for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                          

                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                              
                                                        ____________                                                               
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                              
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                                 
                                                        ____________                                                               
                                         Ex parte SANTOKH S. BADESHA and                                                           
                                             EDWARD L. SCHLUETER, JR.                                                              
                                                        ____________                                                               
                                                      Appeal 2006-1593                                                             
                                                   Application 09/737,413                                                          
                                                  Technology Center 1700                                                           
                                                        ____________                                                               
                                               Decided:  November 13, 2006                                                         
                                                        ____________                                                               

                   Before KIMLIN, KRATZ, and LINCK, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                  
                   KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                             

                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                
                          This is an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-21.                                    
                   We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                               











Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007