Appeal No. 2006-1597
Application No. 09/218,822
Claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and reads as follows:
1. A system comprising:
a source of actual telemetry data regarding an event, wherein the telemetry data
comprises quantitative data measurements of characteristics of the event, wherein the
source comprises at least one data measurement instrument to collect the quantitative data
measurements;
a media manager to manage bandwidth and multicast address assignment and to
export interfaces used to configure and retrieve the actual telemetry data;
a capture manager to manage stream objects, wherein each stream object is to
send a stream relating to the event;
a controller to communicate announcements regarding the event via an exported
internal interface; and
a gaming application utilizing the actual telemetry data to provide a viewing
experience of the event comprising viewing shots and angles not covered by cameras at
the event.
The Examiner relies on the following prior art:
Anderson 5,714,997 Feb. 03, 1998
Khosla 6,080,063 Jun. 27, 2000
(filed Jan. 06, 1997)
Riggins, III (Riggins) 6,195,090 Feb. 27, 2001
(filed Feb. 24, 1998)
Claims 1-16 and 18-25 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as
being based on an inadequate disclosure. Claims 1-16 and 18-25 further stand finally rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by any one of, in the alternative, Riggins, Khosla,
or Anderson.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007