Ex Parte Savage et al - Page 3



        Appeal No. 2006-1611                                               
        Application No. 10/669,771                                         

        for removing BOD and suspended solids from a high volume           
        wastewater stream comprising the claimed steps of piping high      
        volume raw, unsettled wastewater to a deep bed filter without      
        pretreatment in a facultative zone, filtering the high volume      
        wastewater by filtration through the deep bed filter, and          
        backwashing the deep bed filter.  The principal contention of      
        appellants is that Nebolsine does not describe the claimed step    
        of piping the raw wastewater directly to the deep bed filter.      
        Although, as pointed out by the examiner and acknowledged by       
        appellants, the claimed process includes screening the unsettled   
        wastewater prior to piping to the deep bed filter, it is           
        appellants' contention that the specification defines the          
        claimed term "directly" as excluding the narrow or fine            
        screening of Nebolsine.  Appellants point to the paragraph         
        bridging pages 5 and 6 of the present specification for their      
        position that the claimed step of piping directly includes         
        course screening but excludes fine screening.  Appellants state    
        that "[i]n this paragraph the Applicant goes on to explicitly      
        state that 'fine screening is not required'" (page 3 of Reply      
        Brief, second paragraph).                                          


                                    -3-                                    



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007