The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
────────────
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
────────────
Ex parte BANGALORE ASWATHA NAGARAJ and
IRENE SPITSBERG
────────────
Appeal No. 2006-1631
Application No. 10/317,759
────────────
ON BRIEF
────────────
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
REMAND TO THE EXAMINER
Upon review of the image file wrapper record for this
application, we determine that this appeal is not ready for
decision at this time. Accordingly, pursuant to the authority
and provisions of 37 CFR § 41.50(a)(1)(2004), we remand this
application to the jurisdiction of the examiner for action
consistent with our comments below.
This application involves an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the primary examiner’s final rejection of claims 3-10,
13-23, and 26-37 (Brief, page 1). There are two rejections under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) that have been appealed by appellants, both
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007