Appeal No. 2006-1653 Παγε 6
Application No. 09/840,434
We do not find this argument persuasive because Aydelott does disclose low
profile protrusions on the sprocket that are formed by two flat surfaces (see the portion
of the sprocket above A in Figure 3).
In view of the foregoing, we will sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 7
and 8.
In summary:
The examiner’s rejection of claims 1 to 4 is not sustained. The examiner’s
rejection of claims 5 through 9 is sustained.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007