Appeal No. 2006-1669 Page 8
Application No. 10/476,257
The appellant has not mentioned the rejection of claim 24 as being unpatentable over
Allen in either the brief or reply brief. The rejection is thus summarily sustained.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the rejection of claims 24 and 25 under the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. §
112 is reversed and the rejections under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103 are sustained. The decision of
the examiner to reject claims 1-18, 20, 21 and 23-26 is AFFIRMED.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be
extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JENNIFER D. BAHR ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ANTON W. FETTING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Attachments: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aileron and http://www.aviation-
history.com/theory/flt_ctl.htm
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007