The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SHIGERU YANO, MINDIAW WANG and TAROH ICHIKAWA ____________ Appeal No. 2006-1673 Application No. 09/913,725 ____________ HEARD: September 14, 2005 ____________ Before KIMLIN, KRATZ and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 2, and 5-7. Claims 8 and 9, which are the only other claims that remain pending in this application, are withdrawn from further consideration by the examiner as drawn to a non-elected invention. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. BACKGROUND Appellants' invention relates to a molded porous film that is made using a composition including: (1) 45-75 weight percent of a polyolefin-containing resin that comprises 70-98 weight percent linear low density polyethylene and 2-30 weight percentPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007