Ex Parte Fuller et al - Page 2



         Appeal No. 2006-1678                                                       
         Application No. 10/677,869                                                 

         a High Velocity Oxy-Fuel combustion thermal spray process, a               
         wire arc thermal spray process, a vacuum plasma thermal spray              
         process, a flame spray thermal process, or a radio frequency               
         plasma thermal spray process thereby, filling the defect and               
         repairing the defect.                                                      
              The examiner relies upon the following references in the              
         rejections of the appealed claims:                                         
         Brogan 20020110682 A1   Aug. 15, 2002                                      
         Fuller et al. (Fuller) 6,743,468 B2   Jun. 1,  2004                        
                                                    (filed Apr. 17, 2003)           
              Appellants' claimed invention is directed to a method for             
         repairing a defect in a kinetically sprayed surface by applying            
         a repair coating to the defect by thermally spraying a molten              
         material on the defect by a process including a High Velocity              
         Oxy-Fuel combustion thermal spray process.                                 
              Appealed claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11, 14, and 15 stand               
         rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by                  
         Fuller.  Claims 1-4, 6-8, 10-12, and 14-16 stand rejected under            
         35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Brogan.1                     
              Appellants have not presented separate arguments that are             
         reasonably specific to any particular claim on appeal.                     
         Accordingly, the two groups of claims separately rejected by the           
         examiner stand or fall together.                                           

                                                                                   
         1 The examiner has withdrawn the § 103 rejections based on Fuller (see page 3
         of Answer).                                                                
                                        -2-                                         



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007