The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MARCEY L. KELLEY, LAURI A. DOBBS,
TONY BARTOLETTI, and SCOTT D. ELKO
____________
Appeal No. 2006-1707
Application No. 09/964,0291
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, SAADAT, and HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the
Examiner’s final rejection of claim 6. Claims 1-5 and 7-17 have
been canceled.
We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Appellants’ invention is directed to a computer-implemented
system for secure patch software distribution of software from
1 Application for patent filed September 26, 2001, which claims the
filing priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of the Provisional Application
No. 60/236,413, filed September 28, 2000.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007