Appeal No. 2006-1732
Application No. 10/033,622
designation of printer driver) and S404 (i.e., are mounted head
and head setting of printer driver different?) in Figures 42, 49
and 54, respectively. We additionally agree with the examiner’s
finding (answer, page 4) that Moro describes a step of “providing
notification to a user that a selected print driver setting may
result in an adverse printing result” in step S284 (i.e., display
fact that paper is different) and an error dialog box to notify
the user that a paper mismatch exists (Figure 41). A second
error dialog box (Figure 48) notifies the user that a color
cartridge has not been installed for a selected color-printing
mode in step S354 (i.e., present display to achieve conformity
with printing method of mounted head).
In response to the examiner’s contentions (answer, page 4)
that print quality would be adversely affected by the above-noted
erroneous print settings, the appellant argues (brief, page 9)
that a mismatch in paper size “may result in the hard copy
printed being the wrong size and, potentially, the print data not
being properly centered on the page, [but] such a paper size
mismatch would not affect print quality.” Appellant also argues
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007