Ex Parte Cromer et al - Page 1



                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not
                                                binding precedent of the Board.                                           


                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                    ____________                                                          
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                           
                                                    ____________                                                          
                     Ex parte DARYL CARVIS CROMER, BRANDON JOHN ELLISON,                                                  
                            ERIC RICHARD KERN, HOWARD JEFFREY LOCKER                                                      
                                             and JAMES PETER WARD                                                         
                                                    ____________                                                          
                                               Appeal No.   2006-1734                                                     
                                             Application No. 09/855,624                                                   
                                                    ____________                                                          
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                            
                                                    ____________                                                          
                 Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and HOMERE, Administrative Patent                                               
                 Judges.                                                                                                  
                 THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     


                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                          

                         Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final                                  
                 rejection of claims 10 through 15, appellants having canceled claims 1                                   
                 through 9 and 16 through 20.                                                                             






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007